The measures are essentially identical to the draft provisions as proposed by the Luxembourg government and include the amendments proposed by the Finance and Budget Commission of the Parliament, which follow the opinion of the State Council. In particular, the intermediaries that will be subject to legal professional privilege (i.e. for which any reporting obligations to the Luxembourg authorities will be waived) broadly include lawyers  as initially provided, but also chartered accounts  and auditors. Intermediaries that are subject to legal professional privilege will be subject to a notification obligation to any intermediary not subject to legal professional privilege or, where there is no such intermediary, to the taxpayer concerned by the relevant reporting obligations pertaining to a reportable cross-border arrangement. However, they will no longer have to make anonymised reports to the Luxembourg tax authorities containing any reportable cross-border arrangements, as had initially been provided for in the draft bill of law.


For more details on the initial bill of law submitted by the Luxembourg government to the Parliament, please refer to our newsflash Disclosure of cross-border arrangements by intermediaries: DAC 6 implementation in Luxembourg.


In line with the draft bill of law, the new provisions should in principle be applicable as from 1 July 2020, unless postponement of this application date is obtained from the EU Commission in the context of the COVID-19 crisis.


MiFID II: Third country (national) regime – a first list of "equivalent" jurisdictions and territorial scope clarification by the CSSF

On 1st July 2020, the CSSF released its Circular 20/743, thereby partially amending Circular letter 19/716. On the same day, the CSSF also enacted Regulation CSSF 20-02, thereby setting up a first list of "equivalent" jurisdictions under the national third country regime (1).

Read More_